🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in a collective professional network test this week following popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."