🔗 Share this article

This resistance won't be broadcast, but it could have amphibious toes and bulging eyes.

Furthermore, it may involve the horn of a unicorn or the plumage of a chicken.

Whilst demonstrations against the leadership carry on in American cities, protesters are utilizing the energy of a neighborhood dress-up party. They've provided dance instruction, distributed snacks, and ridden unicycles, while police look on.

Mixing levity and politics – a strategy experts call "tactical frivolity" – is not new. Yet it has transformed into a hallmark of American protest in recent years, used by various groups.

A specific icon has proven to be notably significant – the frog. It started after a video of a clash between a man in a frog suit and immigration enforcement agents in Portland, Oregon, became an internet sensation. And it has since spread to protests across the country.

"There's a lot happening with that little blow-up amphibian," says an expert, who teaches at University of California, Davis and an academic who studies creative activism.

The Path From a Cartoon Frog to Portland

It is difficult to examine demonstrations and amphibians without mentioning Pepe, a cartoon character adopted by far-right groups during a political race.

When the character first took off online, it was used to express specific feelings. Later, its use evolved to express backing for a candidate, even one notable meme shared by that figure personally, showing the frog with recognizable attire and hairstyle.

Images also circulated in certain internet forums in darker contexts, as a hate group member. Online conservatives exchanged "rare Pepes" and set up cryptocurrency in his name. His catchphrase, "that feels good", was used an inside joke.

But Pepe didn't start out so controversial.

Matt Furie, artist Matt Furie, has expressed about his disapproval for its appropriation. His creation was meant as simply a relaxed amphibian in this artist's universe.

This character first appeared in a series of comics in 2005 – apolitical and notable for a quirky behavior. In a documentary, which documents the creator's attempt to take back of his work, he stated the character was inspired by his experiences with friends and roommates.

As he started out, the artist tried uploading his work to early internet platforms, where the community began to copy, alter, and reinterpret the frog. When the meme proliferated into fringe areas of the internet, the creator attempted to distance himself from his creation, including ending its life in a final panel.

However, its legacy continued.

"It shows that we don't control imagery," says Prof Bogad. "They can change and shift and be repurposed."

Previously, the notoriety of this meme resulted in frogs were largely associated with the right. But that changed in early October, when a viral moment between an activist wearing a blow-up amphibian suit and a federal agent in Portland captured global attention.

The moment occurred shortly after a directive to deploy the National Guard to Portland, which was described as "war-ravaged". Demonstrators began to gather in droves outside a facility, near an immigration enforcement facility.

Emotions ran high and an agent deployed a chemical agent at the individual, directing it into the ventilation of the puffy frog costume.

The protester, the man in the costume, reacted humorously, remarking it tasted like "something milder". But the incident became a sensation.

Mr Todd's attire was not too unusual for the city, famous for its eccentric vibe and left-wing protests that delight in the unusual – public yoga, 80s-style aerobics lessons, and unique parades. Its creed is "Embrace the Strange."

The costume was also referenced in the ensuing legal battle between the federal government and Portland, which claimed the deployment overstepped authority.

Although the court ruled that month that the president was within its rights to deploy troops, a dissenting judge wrote, referencing in her ruling the protesters' "well-known penchant for wearing chicken suits while voicing their disagreement."

"It is easy to see this decision, which adopts the description of Portland as a war zone, as simply ridiculous," the dissenting judge stated. "Yet the outcome goes beyond absurdity."

The action was halted by courts soon after, and troops have reportedly departed the city.

But by then, the frog had transformed into a powerful anti-administration symbol for progressive movements.

The costume appeared in many cities at anti-authoritarian protests recently. There were frogs – and unicorns and axolotls and dinosaurs – in major US cities. They were in small towns and big international cities abroad.

This item was backordered on major websites, and saw its cost increase.

Controlling the Optics

The link between the two amphibian symbols – lies in the dynamic between the humorous, benign cartoon and a deeper political meaning. This concept is "tactical frivolity."

This approach is based on what Mr Bogad calls the "irresistible image" – often silly, it acts as a "disarming and charming" display that draws focus to a cause without explicitly stating them. This is the unusual prop you wear, or the symbol circulated.

The professor is both an expert on this topic and a veteran practitioner. He's written a book on the subject, and led seminars internationally.

"You could go back to the Middle Ages – under oppressive regimes, absurd humor is used to express dissent a little bit and still have plausible deniability."

The idea of this approach is three-fold, he explains.

When protesters confront authority, a silly costume {takes control of|seizes|influences